Get in touch
Source Marketing Communications
24 Park Square West,
Leeds,
LS1 2PW
Telephone: 0113 380 1644
Email: info@sourcemc.co.uk
Ellis urges cleat test caution

Sept 2011
Leading cable cleat manufacturer, Ellis Patents has issued a
stark warning that incorrect interpretation of short-circuit test
reports is leading to inappropriate cleats being inadvertently
specified and installed - a situation that is putting vital
electrical installations and lives at unnecessary risk.
The issue, according to the UK company's managing director,
Richard Shaw is that the headline figure reported on third party
test reports is frequently, and mistakenly, taken to mean that the
products tested deliver the same level of short-circuit withstand
irrespective of the installation.
"You cannot say that a specific cable cleat has a short-circuit
withstand of 150kA without qualifying the statement," said Richard.
"For example, you'd need to say that the cleat has a short-circuit
withstand of 150kA when securing 43mm cable in trefoil at 300mm
centres."
Shaw highlights a recent report that showed a product
withstanding a peak short-circuit of 138kA, but that on full
reading it became clear that the test rig was set up with four
trefoil circuits in parallel and that, under these circumstances,
whilst the overall fault level was 138kA, each of the four trefoil
groups only saw a quarter of the fault, equivalent to 34.5kA.
"It's easy to see how this report could have been misinterpreted
and the product taken to be much stronger than it really was," he
said.
"This example is just one of many, but it clearly highlights the
need for third party test reports to be carefully analysed. Of
course the onus is on the specifier or contractor to do this, but
as a leading manufacturer we are more than happy to offer
advice."
In order to correctly interpret a report, Shaw suggests that
those with specification responsibility should firstly ask two
simple questions. Firstly, is the product tested the same as the
product being offered? And secondly, is the test installation
similar to the project installation? For example, a test of three
single conductor cables in parallel secured with single cable
cleats cannot be compared with a trefoil installation secured with
trefoil cleats.
He goes on to say that there is only one safe way to interpret a
report and that is by calculating the forces experienced by the
cleat during the test and comparing it with the anticipated force
the nominated cleat would see in the proposed installation.
"The moral of the story is clear - don't judge a short circuit
test report by its cover," he adds. "Instead, make absolutely
certain that the cleat you're specifying is suitable for the
specific installation and if that means asking for project specific
testing then so be it."
Ellis Patents prides itself on the extensive third party testing
it puts all of its products through prior to taking them to market
and the fact that they will always agree to project specific
testing to secure an order. ENDS
Client: Ellis
Patents