Twitter, it seems, has risen above the rest of its social media stable mates and taken its place at the top table of newsworthy sources – a fact that’s hammered home every time a reporter opts to quote what somebody tweeted rather than pick up a phone and ask the opinion of someone relevant to the story they’re working on.
This new world order of news sources has its pros, but is littered with so many cons it calls into question the validity of the entire practice.
The pros are that Twitter does provide access to the thoughts and opinions of the previously inaccessible.
Joe or Joanna Bloggs at the Steeton Weekly Sentinel are never going to be able to pick up the phone to ask Donald Trump his view on a particular story, but they can both now quote the President of the U S of A in any article due to his obsessive, and as we’ve seen this week, oft inflammatory Tweeting behaviour.
And the same can be said for an entire galaxy of stars, wannabes and the downright desperate to be famous.
And that’s where the cons of Twitter being used as a find-a-quote resource start to leap out and hug you in an inappropriate fashion.
But is there a solution? And if so, is there still time to act before Twitter trashes all the others sat around the top table of news sources and claims exclusive access rights to its all new #findaquote service?
Sadly, I don’t believe there is.
The news market is now so fragmented you can pretty much take your pick on which angle you’d like your news reporting to take, and steer well clear of anything that can lay any real claim to being either objective or representative of the opposite point of view.
In fact, it’s getting to the stage now where the only thing you know can trust are good, old fashioned press releases!!
This blog was written in November 2017